Home
 
|  
Bios
 
|  
Links
 
|  
Contact
 
 
 Click here to view archives
  Posted on: Thursday, May 26, 2011
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format     Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
More Confirmation Of The Economic Slowdown

   
 
Recent Market Commentary:
2/28/17   THE STOCK MARKET IS PRICED FOR PERFECTION
2/2/17   THIS BULLISH STOCK MARKET IS VERY LONG IN THE TOOTH
1/3/17   THE STOCK MARKET HAS REACTED POSITIVELY TO TRUMP
12/2/16   PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP WANTS ECONOMIC GROWTH
11/2/16   The CB's have to Learn You Can't Go To "Cold Turkey" from "Wild Turkey"
10/6/16   MALAISE
9/1/16   Central Bankers Have Failed to Stimulate Thus Far
8/5/16   WHY THE WORLDWIDE BUSINESS CYCLE HAS SLOWED DOWN
7/7/16   The Central Bank Bubble Is Worse Than The Dot.Com & Housing Bubbles
6/2/16   Operating Versus GAAP Earnings
4/28/16   The Ending of QE
3/31/16   Corporate Buybacks Aren't What They Used To Be
3/3/16   "Stormy Seas" Both in the U.S. and Globally
2/5/16   More Fed Criticism
1/4/16   Difference between Past Fed Tightening and Now
12/3/15   This Stock Market Is Long In The Tooth
11/5/15   The Global Debt Controls the Global Economy
10/1/15   THE CENTRAL BANK BUBBLE II
9/3/15   Deflation Finally Broke the Market
8/6/15   DEFLATION!

   Next >>
 
Search Archives:

Our comment of two weeks ago outlined the major headwinds likely to impact both the economy and stock market over the period ahead, while last week's comment discussed the actual economic slowdown that was already happening.  Events of the past week have confirmed these views.

The Chicago Fed's National Activity Index of 85 coincident indicators for April dropped to minus 0.45, its lowest level since last August.  The index has now been below zero for five of the last eight months, as is the three-month moving average.  This means that the economy was probably growing below trend in the first quarter, and possibly the second as well. 

First quarter revised GDP growth was not revised upward as the consensus expected, but remained at the originally reported 1.8%.  Moreover the underlying data deteriorated as consumer spending growth was revised down to 2.2% from 2.7% and inventory accumulation was revised up by $9 billion.   Furthermore, major firms have been reducing their second quarter GDP growth estimates to well below 3%.  Recall that toward the end of 2010 most pundits were looking for 4% growth in the quarters ahead.

Initial weekly unemployment claims, reported today, rose to 424,000 and have now remained well above 400,000 for the seventh straight week after a period of coming in below that level.  This does not bode well for upcoming monthly payroll employment.

The ECRI Weekly Leading Index was down again last week, the fourth decline in the last six weeks, and the lowest since the week of January 15th.  A slowdown in this indicator generally suggests a period of tepid growth in the period ahead.

The May numbers for both the Richmond and Kansas City Fed indexes fell sharply, confirming the previously reported results for the Philly Fed and the Empire State Manufacturing Survey.  This strong unanimity strongly suggests that industrial production is still extremely sluggish in May.  These results are consistent with the April decline in core capital goods orders of 2.6%.  Similarly, shipments dropped 1.7%.

Keep in mind that this has happened during a period where QE2 poured reserves into the financial system, the stock market rallied and fiscal policy was boosted by the reduction in payroll withholding.  With all of that, we have an economy that is growing below trend and fading rapidly.  Now QE2 is ending within weeks, fiscal policy is about to tighten and housing prices are still falling with lots of additional supply still coming.

The stock market has now stalled for over three months and appears to be in the process making a top.  The S&P 500 reached an intra-day high of 1344 on February 18th, backed off and then broke out to a new high of 1370 on May 2nd.  It has since declined to well below the 1344 mark, a strong indication that the breakout has failed and that a new decline may be underway. This would be similar to the pattern of 2010, when the market dropped 17% following the end of QE1.  That time the market was saved by the initiation of QE2.  The Fed, however, is running out of ammunition, and we doubt that a QE3, if ever implemented, would be that effective.   

 

Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed


Send to a friend
      Send us feedback    Add to Favorites  

© 2017 Comstock Partners, Inc.. All rights reserved.