Home |  Bios |  Links |  Contact 
 
 Click here to view archives
  Posted on: Thursday, March 15, 2012
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format     Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
The Underestimated Drag Of Household Deleveraging

   
 
Recent Market Commentary:
3/7/13   It's 2000 And 2007 All Over Again
2/28/13   Death By A Thousand Cuts
2/21/13   Sometimes you CAN "Fight the Fed"
2/14/13   CURRENCY WARS WILL ONLY GET WORSE
2/4/13   This Week's Comment will be a Special Report on Home Page
1/25/13   There will be no Market Commentary this week or next week. Please read our "Special Report" "The Consumer, the Debt, and Competitive Devaluation" on the right side of our home page.
1/17/13   Market Strength Based On Dubious Assumptions
1/10/13   The Disastrous Consequences Of Not Raising The Debt Limit
1/3/13   The Difficult Part Is Still Ahead
12/27/12   Happy Holidays
12/20/12   The Market Rally Is Based On Hope Rather Than Substance
12/13/12   Market Rally Based On Shaky Assumptions
12/6/12   The New Era Of U.S. Fiscal Austerity Is About To Begin
11/29/12   The Deficit Did Not Cause The Recession; The Recession Caused The Deficit
11/15/12   It's Not All About The Fiscal Cliff
11/8/12   Back To Reality
10/25/12   Downward Earnings Revisions Are A Game Changer
10/18/12   Why There's No Easy Solution For The Economy
10/11/12   The Bad News Has Not Been Discounted
10/4/12   Betting On Monetary Policy Is A Risky Gamble

Search Archives:

Household debt deleveraging is only at its beginning stages and has a long way to go.  It has already placed a lid on consumer spending that is holding down economic growth, and will continue to do so for the next few years.  To convey how heavy a burden this debt is on the economy we present the following data.

Household debt has averaged 55% of GDP for the last 60 years and climbed to about 65% by 2000, when it really took off and soared to 99% at the peak in 2008.  Since that time it has dropped to 86%.  Although this is commendable progress, it has been the main reason why the current recovery has been by far the slowest since the 1930s.  Furthermore, in order to get the debt down to even the relatively elevated 65% level of 2000, it would be necessary for debt to decline by about $3.2 trillion.  When we consider that this is a whopping 30% of current personal consumer expenditures, the enormity of the task becomes obvious.  Now we don't expect this to happen all at once, and the rise in GDP over coming years will also reduce the ratio.  Therefore the drag on spending won't be as disastrous as the $3.2 trillion implies but will still be a serious impediment to future economic growth.

A similar analysis applies when household debt is measured against consumer disposable income (DPI).  The ratio of debt to DPI averaged 76% over 60 years and increased to about 92% by the end of 1999.  It climbed to 130% at the pre-crisis peak and has since dropped back to 113%.  In order for the ratio to get back only to the year-end 1999 level, debt would have to decline by $2.4 trillion, or 22% of consumer spending.

Is all of this relevant to the real world?  You bet it is.  Fourth quarter GDP was up only 1.6% over a year earlier, while real consumer expenditures were down 1.4% year-over-year in January 2012.  And despite all the talk about an improving economy, it is year-over year consumer expenditure growth that is the leading indicator for production, employment and capital spending. 

When we also consider that the EU (in total the largest economy in the world) is probably entering a recession, and that a major bank is saying that China is already in a hard landing, the outlook for the U.S. is highly questionable.  This is not being discounted by the current exuberance in the stock market

Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed


Send to a friend
      Send us feedback    Add to Favorites  

© 2013 Comstock Partners, Inc.. All rights reserved.